Friday, 19 April 2019

Gov’t bags GHC21.3m in 5 months from ‘Luxury Vehicle Tax’

Image result for ghana Luxury Vehicle Tax



Adnan Adams Mohammed
A total sum of GH¢21.3 million in taxes have been collected from the use of vehicles with engine capacities of 2.9 litres and above between August and December last year, provisional data has revealed..

The amount was GH¢82.7 million or 79.52 per cent below the GH¢104million that was projected to be collected within the period.

The implementation of the vehicle luxury tax begun in August 2018 as a new policy to help raise more revenues.

“The revenue collected, although is very low compared to government’s projection, offers a foundation for future decisions and most importantly, a basis for national conversation around this tax. It is a strong untapped revenue potential that must be pursued but must be well administered,” Dr Alex Ampaabeng, a Fiscal Policy Specialist at Oxfam Ghana has said.
He noted that the development brought to the fore the country’s inability to undertake proper consultation before a new system or initiative was introduced.

According to him, the government was overly ambitious about its targets, especially considering the fact that this was a new levy.

“I do wonder though if the government based its projections on accurate records of taxable vehicles in the country.

If this is indeed the case, then it is very surprising that it had almost 80 per cent shortfall.”

The fiscal policy specialist indicated that the government did not provide enough time and appropriate education before the introduction of this levy.

“Tax knowledge greatly influences tax compliance and the government did very little to improve people’s knowledge about this levy.

“A poor understanding of a particular tax is also likely to have broader implications as uninformed taxpayers may be more prone to seeing the new tax as unjust and might misperceive the benefits of paying it,” he added.
The Chairman of the Vehicle and Asset Dealers Association of Ghana (VADAG), Mr Eric Boateng, in an interview with the paper last week observed that the figures had been authored to show that vehicle users and owners were complying with the levy.

He explained that a preliminary assessment by the VADAG at the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Authority (DVLA) had shown a lower turnout by vehicle users.

“Because we have called for the removal of the levy, the government has deliberately authored the figures to show the public that it is actually benefiting from the tax but in reality the situation is different,” he said.

He said vehicle owners have given a two-week ultimatum to the government to act or face their anger, adding that they were prepared to embark on a series of demonstrations across the country if government failed to listen to their plea.

According to him, more than 5,000 supposed luxury vehicles have been parked in various garages across the country as prospective buyers have refused to buy them because they were trying to avoid the levy.

According to him, those who went for loans to import their cars are unable to pay back and are being harassed by their bankers.

Also, he indicated that other car dealers have not been able to pay their children’s school fees because their businesses were suffering with their investments locked up.

However, attempts by the paper to elicit responses from the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Authority (DVLA) proved futile after several days of attempt.

The vehicle luxury tax was introduced by the government in August 2018 as a new policy to help raise more revenue.

Vehicles with engine capacity of 2950 to 3549 Cubic Centimetres are required to pay GH¢1,000, while those with engines between 3,550 to 4049 cubic centimetres pay GH¢1,500.

Vehicles with engine capacities above 4049cc are to pay GH¢2,000.

The tax also affects vehicles of the listed capacities existing prior to the passage of the law.

Exempted from the levy are; tractors, ambulances, commercial vehicles that have the capacity to transport more than 10 persons and commercial vehicles for the transport of goods.

0 comments: